Years of experience in the fields of biblical studies and religion, as well as in other walks of life, have taught me one valuable lesson: reality is what we make of it, and what we make of it is both the result of our perceptions that translate into interpretations. Things do not mean anything in themselves. Meaning is something we create, and opinions embody and convey such creations. That is why we must take a close look at many perspectives for, according to Plato, “Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.”
The timeless truth contained in this old saying applies to religion as well. To enrich of understanding of it, religion, as a worldwide human phenomenon, should be looked at with different eyes and through different lens. The fact that people around the world still experience “The Holy” differently and have different ways of naming such experiences reminds us that we must study religion from different angles and, at the same time, with the help of different methodologies.
How should we, then, interpret religion and their concrete cultural efforts to encounter the Sacred in the here and now? What are some possible approximations?
The modern study of religion grew out of the Enlightenment in the 17th century in Europe, and from there it spread out to other parts of the world. Indebted to the contributions of a multitude of thinkers who were part of this movement, in its early and late stages, religion may be studied from the following perspectives
- Taking into account the human efforts to facilitate a relationship with a mystical reality, enacted through eyes of faith, legitimated by the same faith, and contextualized through the use of cultural capital (Theology or Religion).
- Observing closely key events, people, times, and circumstances of the past, which have significantly shaped the course of human life, and the place religion has had in this process throughout generations or at particular stages (History).
- Considering the connections that religion has with the secular understanding and use of privilege, power, and resources to help – or not – the larger society achieve its common goals (Politics).
- Fixing our eyes on the points of contact and differences between religion and the human thought-processes and emotions as expressed in concrete behaviors at any given social context (Psychology).
- Focusing on the religious ideas that touch on fundamental ideas pertaining to the nature of human existence, and their evolution, interconnections, logic, and relevance to people’s lives (Philosophy).
- Paying attention to the ways in which religious communities organize themselves and how their members interact with each other, on the basis of their place and function in the world and as replicas of the dominant society (Sociology).
- Analyzing the values, beliefs, and customs of past or remote ethnic groups and their respective institutions in relation to religious ideologies and praxis (through the lens of Anthropology).
- Putting our emphasis on the content, format, context, intentionality, and other characteristics of religious, written traditions (Literature).
- Reflecting on the relationship there is between religion and the production, consumption, and distribution of goods and the structure and classes of people involved in this process (Economics).
- Putting our energy on the aesthetical manifestations of religious views as concrete manifestations of people’s soul and their quest for order, beauty, and meaning (Art).
- And emphasizing the religious values, principles, and norms developed to create sets of expected behaviors that would better societies, distinguish good from evil, and form character (Ethics).
It is obvious that this list is not exhaustive. The disciplines they represent are important, but there are other foci of analysis one could and should add to the list. Needless to day, no option is superior or rules the others out. Although at any given moment one of them (or a combination of them) should be given more notoriety, they should all be kept in mind and used when it is appropriate. Specific approaches must be aware of the larger, pool of options and how they influence each other. A holistic understanding of religion is the ideal!
With all these caveats, not only is it necessary to have an interdisciplinary approach but also a cross-disciplinary one, even to a point in which popular and difficult-to-classify perspectives will be included. The reward ahead? An exciting inquisitive journey that would not exhaust the meaning of religion, nor the attempts to grasp its mystery. Only then will the true nature of religion be seen through the eyes of countless beholders, hopefully to appreciate its manifold “beauty.”
 To read my previous posts of religion, pleas see http://blogs.reinhardt.edu/ich/2017/02/27/how-does-it-work-the-role-of-religion/; http://blogs.reinhardt.edu/ich/2017/01/25/what-is-religion-naming-a-faith-driven-experience/ ; http://blogs.reinhardt.edu/ich/2017/02/10/in-our-image-and-likeness-how-does-religion-facilitate-a-relationship-with-the-holy/ ; http://blogs.reinhardt.edu/ich/2017/02/18/in-the-beginning-the-origin-of-religion/